ABSTRACT
Objective Our retrospective study was aimed to analyze the clinical significance of microsurgical clipping and intravascular embolization in patients with intracranial aneurysm (IA).Methods Clinical data of 86 patients with IA received treatment at our hospital from February 2010 to November 2014 was retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment method, IE group (intravascular embolization,43 cases)and MC group (microsurgical clipping,43 cases).The general information,treatment effect, hospitalization expenses and time and the rate of complication of the patients between two groups were compared.Results There was no sta-tistical difference in general information between two groups (P >0.05).The cure rate of patients in IE group was obviously better than that in MC group (P <0.01).The hospitalization expenses in IE group was lower than that in MC group,and the hospitalization time was shorter than that in MC group,all the differences had statistical significance (P <0.01).The rate of complication in IE group was obviously lower than that in MC group (P <0.01).Conclusion The clinical effect of intravascular embolization was significantly better than microsurgical clipping,which is worth promoting in clinic.